My approach is to take a reading stimulus from a range of sources: newspapers, magazines, novel extracts, ABC articles, textbooks and on a range of topics.
Here is some of our stimulus material:
Slug Poo and Mushrooms (New Scientist)
Spider webs and hearing (New Scientist)
Exercise and your brain (ABC article)
Social Media and Defamation (ABC article)
Blue Banded Bees (The School Magazine)
Short stories – ‘Buried’, ‘Sound Wave’, ‘Family Gathering’ – (The School Magazine)
I have written other materials on participles and appositives, however they draw extracts from lots of places. We’ve also got stuff prepared on rain forests drawn from stage 4 geography textbooks.
The point of engaging with a range of stimulus is to try and keep the reading and ideas as interesting as possible even though we are doing a lot of hard work focusing of building vocabulary, language conventions, and writing.
You can preview the resource on ‘Blue Banded Bees’ below. If you like it, you can also download it. Hopefully it is of some use to you.
This extends the previous post where I provided a simple activity for students to play around with sentence structure and craft. All of this stuff builds on the ideas I wrote about in The Art of the Sentence. This activity adds a layer of complexity and creativity through the range of phrases students could choose. You will find the resource at the end of this post.
The activity has a list of participle phrases and their punctuation to be used as an opener of a sentence, a closer to the sentence, or a interrupter of the subject and verb. The images below show the openers and interrupter participle phrases.
Below are the main clauses – which you would use with the opener and closer phrases. The second image of the main noun and verb enables students to flexibly create their own interrupters using the participle phrases. You should be able to get some interesting combinations with this activity.
Here is the what I would generally do with this activity. The first focus on the opener and closer structures. This limits the choices and students are only dealing with a few strips of paper/laminated cards or digital artefacts. When students have created some combinations and shared them, continue to reinforce the language conventions and the discuss the impact of the different choices.
Then add complexity to the task and distribute the interrupters, main noun and verb phrases. There are a range of different possibilities students will come up with. The image below shows some possible combinations.
In this post I’ll show you a few ways to embed the basic subordinate clause into your teaching. This is one of the clauses assessed in Australia’s National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). This approach can be used with the various sentence structure concepts I outlined in The Art of the Sentence.
This approach is easily differentiated – for struggling writers you focus on learning how to write the structures, and for stronger writers you can use the structures as way of teaching and embedding grammatical knowledge and concepts.
Below is the Stage 3 indicator for Outcome EN3-6B (this is built upon in EN4-4B and EN5-5B).
understand the difference between main and subordinate clauses and that a complex sentence involves at least one subordinate clause (ACELA1507)
The general ‘rule’ is that when you begin a sentence with one of these words, you are likely to need a comma at some point to separate the clause. The image below contains the common subordinating conjunctions, easily remembered by the mnemonic AAAWWUBBIS (ah-woo-bis). NAPLAN training uses the mnemonic of A White Bus.
Here is a table of examples of this structure
How can I make this content statement part of a regular instructional practice and not as a standalone grammar instruction unit? The steps below are a rough guide of what I do, progressively adding detail.
Begin with a model sentence(s) and interrogate what kids notice about the model sentence. Ideally this should be the simplest model you can find to explain the concept.
Draw attention to the use of punctuation and discuss what the punctuation in doing in the sentence.
Imitate the sentence as a joint class construction.
Provide opportunity for independent imitation of the model sentence. This will give you rapid formative feedback on student skill.
Look for examples of the structure in the texts your class is reading. Collect examples and use these as WAGOLL samples (What A Good One Looks Like).
Repeat this routine on a daily basis with different models. Provide a mnemonic to remember the common subordinators
Interrogate the model sentence – where are the verbs, which part is the essential meaning, can the sentence be rearranged without impact on the meaning, which part can be deleted and the sentence still make sense, which part is only a ‘part of a sentence’.
Consider naming the relevant parts (main clause, subordinate clause)
Look for examples in daily texts.
Quick write opportunities with the success criteria being the use of this sentence structure. Students review their piece identifying the concept.
The key is to continue to embed these concepts into daily conversation and writing. Apart from some of the writing activities mentioned above (Quick Writes and Imitation of model sentences) here are a couple that I think are great to do to reinforce and develop these ideas further:
Parallel writing structure
One activity is to get students to write chapter titles using only the subordinate clause. These are titles that begin with the common subordinators in the list above. It is an easy task to implement and it provides the necessary practice that some students need. It also gives you the opportunity to discuss the grammar of the sentence, if the students are ready for that.
Here are some samples for you:
When in Rome
While the City Sleeps
Until Day Breaks
Because of Winn-Dixie
If Looks Could Kill
parallel writing structures
Parallel structures are a way to create rhythm and beat in writing. We can use grammatical and literal repetition to help students to emulate professional author craft.
Harry Noden uses this sentence as the base for students to build some parallel structures:
“The old cabin made me feel close to nature.”
He then adds the subordinate conjunction when:
“When I awoke to the aroma of burnt fire logs, when I looked out the window and saw the morning fog roll across the lake,when I felt the slight chill of the mountain air, the old cabin made me feel close to nature“
You can see how the rhythm and beat has been impacted by this grammatical and literal repetition. If they know the model, then look for ways to help them use it. Ask them to create parallel structures using the subordinating conjunctions.
You can download this explicit slide deck, if it is useful to you, on the subordinate conjunctions. You can find it in the Art of the Sentence post.
Everyone knows that inference is one of the weakest skills identified by NAPLAN. I’m not pretending that what I outline below is the only way to teach inference, but one tool for teaching this skill to struggling students. The way I have found success is through combining reading and writing skills.
So, in this post you will get a tool to help teach inference and a slide deck to support that instruction.
Essentially, we use sentence models to show students how authors craft inferences and get student to imitate those models with their own compositions.
When we say to kids “show” don’t “tell”, often we are asking them to write in such a way so the reader needs to infer something about the setting or character.
These are the model sentences used in the slide deck, pulled from a range of novels:
Pinching his nose, Harry drank the potion down in two large gulps.
“Hello,” said Ben, squeezing his bottom lip.
The camera crews, perched like buzzards on rooftops, only add to the effect.
Lockie cooked inside.
The father glared at his daughter with deep suspicion, but said nothing.
The man strode along the platform
Rain-rotten shingles drooped over the eaves of the veranda; oak trees kept the sun away.
The remains of a picket drunkenly guarded the front yard.
Ben stood, walked quietly out of his bedroom and tiptoed up the hall, heart keeping time with his footsteps.
Radley had been leaning against the wall when I came into the room, his arms folded across his chest.
Fingers trembling slightly, he opened the white envelope.
Using a few targeted sentence structures and models is a powerful way to get kids to notice how writers make us infer detail about the text, and how it can transform how a student writes.
In the very first example, a typical student composition would be:
Harry drank the foul smelling and tasting potion in two large gulps.
They have gone into tell mode. JK Rowling, however, includes the participle phrase at the beginning of the sentence.
JK Rowling makes us infer something about this potion; it’s smell by the visual detail conveyed by the participle phrase ‘pinching his nose’.
We can get students to learn how to craft an inference by imitating the style and structure of this sentence.
If you have taught these structures already, you have the opportunity to reinforce the grammatical element. It’s the authentic way of teaching grammar in context. If you have taught a kid to use the participle phrase in their writing, it is likely that they are starting to write some examples where the reader needs to infer meaning. This opens up opportunities to discuss inference on a daily basis using any text.
Look through the slide deck below to see how the other sentences can be used to support students to identify inference but also create their own in sentences.